... In Which I Save the Print Industry

Comments

I'm in a publishing industry. Online versus print is one of our biggest ongoing debates. There's an audience for both right now, and bridging the 2 is challenging.

It's ironic you post this today, which is the last print day of one of my hometown's (Seattle) papers, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer. They are finally shutting down the presses for good after 150 years. They will continue their online version though I'm not sure how much good that will do them now. They missed the window.
It's really frustrating that everyone has to debate the web way vs the old way. I'm an old tabletop roleplayer and the circles I travle in debate that as well. Some say that MMO's like World of Warcraft are killing the role-playing hobby, but I honestly don't think that's true, it's just no one can move beyond the old models of distribution and are still trying to apply paper principles to the digital medium. What people should be doing is trying to apply digital principles to the paper medium and seeing what works. Paper is better in many ways, but digital marketing is becoming far more efficient. Combining the strengths and restructuring the business models is what's needed, not whining and crying. With this idea newspapers like the NYT could simply become hosts and revenue distributors for specific writers and reporters who would get chosen by the reader at personal preference. The best writers of course would rise to the top and it would be easier to see which ones are the best.
It's certainly going to be interesting to watch where it all goes. I wonder about the current shallowness of the on-line material. A lot of the stories are something like a sound bite. Not the depth you sometimes see in the better news papers.

But I'm guessing that is what the readers are looking for or the quality would be better. Personally, I like both but for different reasons. Sometimes I just want a summary.

We actually had some bigshot (can't remember the guy's name) come do a lecture on print vs web, and how the web is pretty much destroying newspaper companies because they're giving their stuff away for free. He was suggesting doing something kind of like iTunes where you pay to play.

The web does have its plusses, but the fact of the matter is, it's watering down real journalism in a major way. I mean, just look at the presence of Wikipedia. Our student newspaper used wikipedia as an reference in one of its articles. Are you KIDDING me?

If we can pay decent journalists how are we going to get trustworthy news?

Wikipedia works alright as a springboard to finding more legitimate articles, though referencing it in a professional capacity probably isn't well... professional. The thing is, sure 90% or maybe even 99% of all journalism on the web is crap, but 1% could really be quite informed.

Anyhow like I said, playing the blame game really isn't going to fix things at all. The internet has made information exchange vastly more affordable which is impacting the recording industry, the print industry, the gaming industry... film. This isn't going to go away, but it's not "the end of everything" as some people in the industry would have us believe.
[this is good]

Excellent article.

And it didn't even have any female nudity! Impressive.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

About Me

Toe-Knee
Canada
"The only demand I make of my reader is that he should devote his whole life to reading my works." –James Joyce

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

  • Powered by Vox